Series of Rooms
You speak, he said, with a desperate and turbulent mind.
You speak, he said, with a desperate and turbulent mind.
Can we still remember what it was like? What the fuck is a protest song? We live in the world of Eternal War, where Demons in the Night come to crash jetplanes into our skyscrapers, where muggers without souls stick knives into soft flesh, where no one is safe, where we die in hospital beds, painful tubes shoved down up and into our orifices — painful — dark – black & bleak, bend and break, crack winds, I am Young, Young Tom O’Bedlam, Methinks its not a journey —
Karl Marx was a law student too, once. Famous law students who left to do some thing better. To stand against the abyss, eyes open into the storm, and face it — pure courage, eyes open — the strong death — without regrets — accepting the truth and denying all falsehoods — singing lyrically — not yet cynical about the heroic path you still might tread — living in this artificial world — constructed out of what, wattle and daub? The roads are paved with boneskulls, says Zeddicus to my right. There to my left sits Michael II Transfigured, Metatron. He cannot talk. He is not there. He has been silenced. There is no comfort. I am other people, I say to myself. You know it don’t you — when you dream, you slip into other people’s minds — I don’t know what time it is; I don’t know what day it is; I am losing my mind; slipping, slipping, falling, slipping, down down down down down — dancing with the words to the music — I’ve strung them on a wire, and pulling it this way, make them dance.
What does this have to do with Nixon? says Jehosophat, sitting above me. There is a whitebearded frog floating in the far left upper corner of my room, hovering just there right beneat the sealing. Wait no — that it isn’t happening now — that happened some other time — impenetrable, they will say this — incommunicable — it is communicable to me — this sick sweet madness — this unrepentant lucre — flowing flowing words — wrestling, dancing with these soft and plastic words and thoughts — the word adorns the thought and the thought adorns the word, coming forth, summoned from memory and thought, two crows on my shoulder, play a game of free association, play the game of ring around the rosy, write to music, wheelwright, craftsman, shipbuilder —
Go down to South Ferry and remind yourself its an island. How many beautiful offices of servants have I been to this sad fall while the world collaspes all around them. Glad I’m not in your seat, says I, America America, this Swan Song’s For You — Dance the Dance of the 21st Century, Shiva. Dance the Dance of the 21sts Century, Shiva. One foot front, then one foot back, kinda like the Electric Slide, or 1990s bar bitzvahs, or 1980s danceparty, a genre of music, Chromeo, who needs that, I need a bassline, an electric guitar, and a song that never ends, no rockstasr pretension, just don’t stop playing — don’t stop playing now — we’re jamming now, brother, we’re jamming now — just sound sound and sense and sound without sense rhyme but no reason — be here now — music perfectly duplicates imitates represents the dimension of time in our lives — but if the speakers are good enough, and your eyes are closed, you can see it, see the different strains of music , see the different instruments, lick of electric guitar, drums, bassline, I am the Great Procrastinator
Ironic, considering the nature of my thoughts these past several days, and chilling, the language of the visual cortex, bright and bloody, glowing on computer screens, placed there by layer and layer of electron combs and filters — I can see what you’re seeing —
When we see (to pick one sense out of many) we do not see what is seen but rather see what we see. That is, we do not see the object standing or the events unfolding before us, but rather we see our vision of this object or these events. Our vision is chemical, the intricate workings of soft & spongy clockwork (the eye is not just a gelatinous ball of goop), twisting and turning beneath the “light of other days” — old light, stale, shining down — and somehow this chemical vision produces within our heads the illusion of vision — we think we can see the world — but in truth, we live within our skulls.
Even so, we must accept there is most likely some truth to our visions, that these chemical apparitions summoning the outer world must bear some close correlation with the spatial objects beyond our actual perception — refined into something useful by the generations of competitive dying of which we are the heirs.1
1. Isn’t it strange that we’ve now short-circuited this process by not dying quite so quickly — what does this mean? That natural biological selection has slowed, and that our improvement now lies within our own hands and responsibility.
Language that reveals and obscures, or in obscuring revealing. Some relevance to Plato and Aristotle’s different conceptions of art and the cave — in terms of the motives and outcomes.
stephoscopes: i am not on facebook so i cannot be your friend there
Josh: I see
stephoscopes: how are you?
Josh: ok
stephoscopes: ok its raining a LOT
Josh: I’ve been mythologizing and romanticizing you guys quite a a lot lately
stephoscopes: but it will be new years soon
Josh: it will
stephoscopes: are you coming to new years
Josh: thanks
stephoscopes: its wack
Josh: I’ve plotted it out a couple times
stephoscopes: the fire marshal is on our ass right now so there might not be beds for a couple of months
Josh: well, might be for the best, considering the cold
stephoscopes: yeah, its good, i have a little house!
Josh: I deduced some intimation of such
stephoscopes: come to new years are you coming?
Josh: oh, I have a prior obligation
stephoscopes: in the tropics?
Josh: unfortunately no
stephoscopes: bumzo
Josh: I’ll be acking out a teen horror movie in the poconos
stephoscopes: oh blood capsules
Josh: the Significant Other
stephoscopes: oh….the g.f.
Josh: yes
stephoscopes: let me guess her name
Josh: no
stephoscopes: emily
Josh: no, but that’s nice
stephoscopes: dara
Josh: no
stephoscopes: katie
Josh: no
stephoscopes: danielle
Josh: no
stephoscopes: michelle
Josh: no
stephoscopes: rochelle
Josh: no
stephoscopes: jenna
Josh: no, but sounds like
stephoscopes: sarah!
Josh: not that close
stephoscopes: no HOLD
Josh: Bob
stephoscopes: lemer
Josh: no
stephoscopes: ummm
Josh: again
stephoscopes: pannera
Josh: no
stephoscopes: hm this is hard
Josh: that would be
stephoscopes: heather
Josh: I was fixed up with an Isabel once
stephoscopes: naomi
Josh: no
stephoscopes: ew
Josh: no, I was game
stephoscopes: what about johanna
Josh: no
stephoscopes: does it start with an h
Josh: if you chop off the top part
stephoscopes: ANNA!
Josh: closer
stephoscopes: banana!
Josh: it would come up in the name game of banana
stephoscopes: tanna
Josh: colder
stephoscopes: danna
Josh: colder
stephoscopes: fanna
Josh: say nanna
stephoscopes: nama
Josh: warmer
stephoscopes: sanna
Josh: colder
stephoscopes: lanna
Josh: no
stephoscopes: elinor
Josh: warmer
stephoscopes: barbara
Josh: no
stephoscopes: anla
Josh: no
stephoscopes: is it the first letter
Josh: that’s funny
stephoscopes: see
Josh: it’s contagious
stephoscopes: everything is
Josh: yes
stephoscopes: more clues
Josh: a weather pattern over the Pacific
stephoscopes: katrina!
Josh: that was the gulf
stephoscopes: julie
Josh: wrong
stephoscopes: hawaii
Josh: no
stephoscopes: what patterns
Josh: temperature patterns
stephoscopes: colder
Josh: yes
stephoscopes: mmmmmmm
Josh: oh
stephoscopes: canoe
Josh: no
stephoscopes: yarn
Josh: close
stephoscopes: annie
Josh: I could call her that
stephoscopes: ann
Josh: all the same in Hebrew
stephoscopes: is that it?
Josh: no
stephoscopes: anni
Josh: anagram of
stephoscopes: nina!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Josh: yes
stephoscopes: WWWWWWWWWWOOOOOOOWWWWWW
Josh: it was
stephoscopes: i feel like i just finished a race and I GOOOOOOOOOOOOTTT THERE
ok
Josh: congratulations
stephoscopes: but i will talk to you soon come to the next time
Josh: maybe after new years
stephoscopes: yes everyone returns
Josh: you too
stephoscopes: happy rest of!
Josh: say hello to the troopers
stephoscopes: will do.
Josh: bye Steph
stephoscopes: bye bye josh
Kelly Reichardt’s follow-up to Old Joy, like that film co-written with novelist Jonathan Raymond and based on a short story he penned called “Train Choir.” What’s this movie about?
How hard it is in America. Being adrift and alone. The fragility of our social safety net. I read in an interview its impetus came from Katrina, and both the bungled aftermath and the desperate poverty of those who were failed during that seven-day trial — those who when told to leave realized they had no place to go and no way to get there.
We don’t know why Wendy is heading to Ketchikan, AK — I mean we do, to work, and her Indiana license plates on her 1988 Honda Accord imply a story of the rust belt, maybe — Ketchikan, AK, remember was the terminus of the bridge to nowhere — and so in an American that’s rusting away, a single girl, feminity abandoned, perhaps artfully so to protect her from the predators of the road (one of whom we meet in a chilling scene that must happen more than we realize, every day, in the real world), sets out, her solace her dog.
It is a sketch. Artful. Graceful. Sad and lonely. People try, but who knows what they do all day long — and Wendys realizes that even a dog is too much responsibility —
We sit there with Wendy, as she sleeps in a car, washes up in a gas station bathroom, gets caught shoplifting and arrested, loses her dog. Life is hard, the movie says. We know this, but we don’t know this — and while we are far from Wendy, the differences between her life and ours are minimal — maybe especially for me — but for a lot of us — drifting — one check away —
Six dollars, maybe seven, trade hands at one point in the movie. It is a telling moment.
The crust-punk neohobos of the Rusty 21st Century (America’s Autumn, they will call it) gathered round the fire, doing drugs, semi-dangerous.
The security guard outside Walgreens. The kid who turns Wendy in, with a little crucifix around her neck. Freight trains rolling by. The mighty trees of the Pacific Northwest. The little houses. The small town bus. America.
Did I remember what I think I remember? What is the process of the self-authorship of memory? These are the movies in our head, purporting to be the remnants of our lives — when I try, I can remember carrying my uncle in his coffin to his grove through the snow — I remember his funeral, sitting next to my cousin Jacob, sitting next to his grandfather Dan — (who had the face of my uncle grown old, my uncle whose face would now never grow old — oh memory, oh sadness)
The fuzzy trace theory model canl help explain how false memories are created. According to Reyna and Brainerd (1995) the fuzzy trace theory states that the processing of items is determined by gist traces or verbatim traces. The gist traces are general senses and meanings of presented items that consist of rational information. Gist traces are pieces of information that closely match the event, while verbatim traces are item-level data, which is specific detail of item (Neuschata, Lampinen, Preston, Hawkins, & Toglia, 2002). Reyna and Kiernan (1995) found that participants sometimes falsely notice verbatim traces, although they had better remembered gist traces. The fuzzy trace theory theory will help in deciphering the cause of false memories in the photographs that are shown in the present study.
http://www.anselm.edu/internet/psych/theses/2005/creaser/Introduction.html
Band, named after pickpocket academy in South America in the 1980s, that led to pickpocket epidemic on easts coast in the 80s.
Influences: Dreampop, 4AD Records, M83, David Archuleta
However, it was at one of these balls that I first saw the cake-walk. There was a contest for a gold watch, to be awarded to the hotel head-waiter receiving the greatest number of votes. There was some dancing while the votes were being counted. Then the floor was cleared for the cake-walk. A half-dozen guests from some of the hotels took seats on the stage to act as judges, and twelve or fourteen couples began to walk for a sure enough, highly decorated cake, which was in plain evidence. The spectators crowded about the space reserved for the contestants and watched them with interest and excitement. The couples did not walk round in a circle, but in a square, with the men on the inside. The fine points to be considered were the bearing of the men, the precision with which they turned the corners, the grace of the women, and the ease with which they swung around the pivots. The men walked with stately and soldierly step, and the women with considerable grace. The judges arrived at their decision by a process of elimination. The music and the walk continued for some minutes; then both were stopped while the judges conferred; when the walk began again, several couples were left out. In this way the contest was finally narrowed down to three or four couples. Then the excitement became intense; there was much partisan cheering as one couple or another would execute a turn in extra elegant style. When the cake was finally awarded, the spectators were about evenly divided between those who cheered the winners and those who muttered about the unfairness of the judges. This was the cake-walk in its original form, and it is what the colored performers on the theatrical stage developed into the prancing movements now known all over the world, and which some Parisian critics pronounced the acme of poetic motion.
— James Weldon Johnson: The Autobiography of an Ex-Colored Man, 1912, Chapter 5, page 50